Istanbul Local Government Policy on Managing Syrian Refugees Integration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jiwp.v7i2.59Keywords:
Istanbul, Local, Refugee, Syrian, TurkeyAbstract
The integration of Turkish refugees is a policy of harmonizing refugees into society, and the Istanbul local government tries to implement policies in the same direction as the Turkish Central Government. This article examines the policies and role of the Istanbul government in handling Syrian refugees in the Istanbul area in refugee integration. Turkey has been one of the largest recipients and donors of aid for Syrian refugees. Meanwhile, Istanbul has been a place where many migrants live, especially Syrian refugees. This research uses qualitative methods by collecting data through literature studies and descriptive data analysis. The article uses the cosmopolitanism theory to explain how the Istanbul government's policy in accepting refugee arrivals and its intention to help refugees are based on humanitarian principles. The findings showed that the lack of clarity in the Turkish government's general policy, which does not provide general standards and procedures for refugee integration, caused the Istanbul local government to adopt adaptive policies. Health and education are still the main challenges constrained by resources and funds. The assistance the Istanbul government provides Syrian refugees is motivated by humanitarian reasons, where the Istanbul government views Syrian refugees as human beings with the same rights as other Turkish citizens through a cosmopolitanism approach.
References
RP. (2019, August 9). Progress Report 2019 - 3RP Syria Crisis. Retrieved November 5, 2023, from https://www.3rpsyriacrisis.org/portfolio/progressreport2019/
Abohalaka, R. (2018). Determination of Perceived Language Barriers in Accessing Healthcare Services According to Syrian Refugees Visiting Two Training and Research Hospitals in Ankara.
Akgündüz, Y., Van Den Berg, M., & Hassink, W. H. (2015). The impact of refugee crises on host labor markets: The case of the Syrian refugee crisis in Turkey.
Albu, D. (2019). UNHCR Global trends report: forced displacement in 2018. Drepturile Omului, 114.
Appiah, K. A. (2017). Cosmopolitanisms. NYU Press.
Balcioğlu, Z. (2018). Sultanbeyli, İstanbul, Turkey, A Case Study of Refugees in Towns. Boston: Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, https://fic.tufts.edu/wp-content/uploads/RITReportSultanbeyli Istanbul Turkey.pdf, Erişim Tarihi, 10, 2018.
Balkan, B., Tok, E., Torun, H., & Tumen, S. (2018). Immigration, housing rents, and residential segregation: Evidence from Syrian refugees in Turkey.
Bayraktar, U. (2014). Decentralisation, poly-centralisation and re-centralisation of Turkish politics: A matrix of central-local relationships. Centralization Decentralization Debate Revisited, 321–347.
Bidinger, S., Lang, A., Hites, D., Kuzmova, Y., Noureddine, E., Akram, S., ... & Kistner, T. (2014). Protecting Syrian refugees: Laws, policies, and global responsibility sharing. Boston: Boston University School of Law, International Human Rights Clinic.
Bither, J., Küppers, I., & Ziebarth, A. (2016). Istanbul: migration metropolis. In A Tale of Three Cities: New migration and integration realities in Istanbul, Offenbach and Tangier (pp. 6–9). German Marshall Fund of the United States. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep18998.5
Cetinoglu, T., & Yilmaz, V. (2021). A contextual policy analysis of a cash programme in a humanitarian setting: the case of the Emergency Social Safety Net in Turkey. Disasters, 45(3), 604-626.
Cloeters, G., & Osseiran, S. (2019). Healthcare access for Syrian refugees in Istanbul: A gender-sensitive perspective workshop report.
Daily Sabah, (2019, March 29). Language barrier, high numbers a challenge for refugee care. Retrieved from https://www.dailysabah.com/turkey/2019/03/29/language-barrier-high-numbers-a-challenge-for-refugee-care
Danış, D., & Nazlı, D. (2019). A faithful alliance between the civil society and the state: Actors and mechanisms of accommodating Syrian refugees in Istanbul. International Migration, 57(2), 143–157.
Dedeoğlu, S., & Bayraktar, S. S. (2019). Refuged into Precarious Jobs: Syrians’ Agricultural Work and Labor in Turkey. Integration through Exploitation: Syrians in Turkey, 13.
Dekker, R., Engbersen, G., Klaver, J., & Vonk, H. (2018). Smart refugees: How Syrian asylum migrants use social media information in migration decision-making. Social Media+ Society, 4(1), 2056305118764439.
Demirhan, Y., & Aslan, S. (2015). Türkiye’nin sınır ötesi göç politikaları ve yönetimi. Birey ve Toplum Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 23–62.
Elicin, Y. (2018). Refugee crisis and local responses: An assessment of local capacities to deal with migration influxes in Istanbul. Hrvatska i Komparativna Javna Uprava: Časopis Za Teoriju i Praksu Javne Uprave, 18(1), 73–99.
Eliçin, Y. (2019). The Role and Capacity of Local Government in Managing Migration in Istanbul. Hrvatska i Komparativna Javna Uprava: Časopis Za Teoriju i Praksu Javne Uprave, 19(3), 431–454.
Erdoğan, Ö. B., & Demirel, E. (2020). Syrian Refugees and Community Interpreting: An Attempt at a Sociology of Translation in the Example of Sultanbeyli. International Journal of Media Culture and Literature, 6(2), 97-124.
Erdoğan, M. M. (2017). Urban Refugees from" detachment" to" harmonization": Syrian Refugees and Process Management of Municipalities: the Case of Istanbul. Gafa Media.
Erdoğan, M. (2017). Thinking outside the camp: Syrian refugees in Istanbul. The Migration Information Source.
Erdoğan, M. (2019). Syrian refugees in Turkey. Konrad–Adenauer-Stiftung Report.
Fine, R. (2007). Cosmopolitanism. Routledge.
Hürriyet. (2017, April 18). 'No' votes prevail in Turkey's three largest cities. Retrieved November 5, 2023, from https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/no-votes-prevail-in-turkeys-three-largest-cities--112116
İçduygu, A., & Osseiran, S. (2022). Syrian Refugees in Istanbul and Gaziantep: Comparative Findings on Settlement, Livelihood and Support. CMI Insight.
Kale, B., & Erdoğan, M. (2019). The impact of GCR on local governments and Syrian refugees in Turkey. International Migration, 57(6), 224–242.
Kavas, A., Avşar, İ., Kadkoy, O., & Bilgiç, E. Ç. (2019). İstanbul’da Suriyeliler ve savaş sonrası Suriye gettoları. İstanbul: TEPAV Yayınları.
Directorate General of Migration Management. (2018). Law on Foreigners and International Protection”, Retrieved from http://www.goc.gov.tr/files/files/eng_minikanun_5_son.pdf
Leghtas, I. (2019). Insecure future: Deportations and lack of legal work for refugees in Turkey. Field Report. Refugees International.
Lowndes, V., & Polat, R. K. (2022). How do local actors interpret, enact, and contest policy? An analysis of local government responses to meeting the needs of Syrian refugees in Turkey. Local Government Studies, 48(3), 546–569.
Memişoğlu, F., & Yavçan, B. (2022). Beyond ideology-a comparative analysis of how local governance can expand national integration policy: the case of Syrian refugees in Istanbul. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(3), 503–523.
Mufidah, I. Z., Prasodjo, H., Rijal, N. K., & Prakoso, H. A. (2022). Turkey’s Reasons to Normalize Diplomatic Relations with Israel in 2021. Journal of Islamic World and Politics, 6(2), 228–252. https://doi.org/10.18196/jiwp.v6i2.16304
Nimer, M., & Oruç, T. (2019). Sustainable Approaches to Humanitarian Assistance in the Field of Language Education for Adult Refugees in Turkey. IPC Mercator Policy Brief. Istanbul Policy Center Sabancı University.
Robby, H. M. F. (2021). Humanitarian Crisis and the Arduous Path to Principled Pluralism: A Politico-Theological Analysis on Indian and Turkish Foreign Policies. Journal of Islamic World and Politics, 5(2). 293–312. https://doi.org/10.18196/jiwp.v5i2.12062
Rottmann, S. B. (2020). Integration policies, practices, and experiences–Turkey Country report.
Saraçoğlu, C., & Bélanger, D. (2019). Loss and xenophobia in the city: contextualizing anti-Syrian sentiments in Izmir, Turkey. Patterns of Prejudice, 53(4), 363–383.
Soykan, C. (2012). The new draft law on foreigners and international protection in Turkey. Oxford Monitor of Forced Migration, 2(2), 38-47.
Sultanbeyli Municipality. (2015). ‘2015-2019 Strategic Plan’, Retrieved from http://www.sultanbeyli.istanbul/media/files/487/stratejik-plan-2015-2019.pdf.
TBMM. (2018). Göç ve uyum raporu. İnsan Hakları İnceleme Komisyonu Mülteci Hakları Alt Komisyonu (26. Dönem 3. Yasama Yılı), Retrieved from https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/komisyon/insanhaklari/docs/2018/goc_ve_uyum_raporu. pdf
Üstübici, A. (2022). ‘Street-level justifications’: Service providers mediating refugee reception in the urban context of Istanbul. Journal of Refugee Studies, 35(1), 74–92.
UNHCR. (2019, July 31). UNHCR Turkey - Fact Sheet July 2019 - Türkiye. ReliefWeb. Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/report/turkey/unhcr-turkey-fact-sheet-july-2019
UNICEF. (2019, February 1). UNICEF Turkey 2018 Humanitarian Results - Türkiye. ReliefWeb. Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/report/turkey/unicef-turkey-2018-humanitarian-results
Woods, A. E., & Kayalı, N. (2017). Engaging Syrian communities: The role of local government in Istanbul. Istanbul Policy Center Istanbul.
Yildiz, F. (2017). The Dark Side of Syrian Refugee Crisis: Child, Early and Forced Marriage in the Case of Turkey. e-Journal of Law, 3, 39-66.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Audi Izzat Muttaqien, Sidik Jatmika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
